[Adium-devl] Adium 0.89
Christopher Forsythe
chris at growl.info
Tue Feb 7 22:07:59 UTC 2006
Heh. It's just a version number, so who cares?
On Feb 7, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Zachary West wrote:
> Let's go one more level -- .987654321b7rc2!
> WOOOTTTTTTTTTTT!
>
> --- Ofri Wolfus <ofri.wolfus at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In the real world 0.81 < 0.89 and 0.810 = 0.81 :-P
>> How about 0.891?
>>
>> - Ofri
>>
>> On 07/02/2006, at 23:06, Christopher Forsythe wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 7, 2006, at 2:37 PM, David Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 7, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Christopher Forsythe
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 7, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Evan Schoenberg
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone have any other major bugs which
>> need addressing in what
>>>>>> really should be the last 0.8x release (since
>> if it isn't, what're
>>>>>> we calling the next one? ;) ) or the like? If
>> not, this should be
>>>>>> a short beta run since the MSN change has been
>> extensively tested
>>>>>> in the above ticket and the Jabber change,
>> though far-reaching,
>>>>>> turned out to be a one-liner.
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought the consensus when skipping .90 as a
>> major release was to
>>>>> use the .90 - .99 as security fixes/major bug
>> fixes like we did
>>>>> the .
>>>>> 8x series.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> I certainly wasn't aware of it, if so. That seems
>> like it would be
>>>> rather confusing for users (although probably not
>> as confusing as a
>>>> 0.810).
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>
>>> How would it be confusing?
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Adium-devl mailing list
>>> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
>>>
>>
> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Adium-devl mailing list
>> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
>>
> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com
>>
>
More information about the devel
mailing list