[Adium-devl] Adium 0.89

[Zachary West]

Let's go one more level -- .987654321b7rc2!
WOOOTTTTTTTTTTT!

--- Ofri Wolfus <ofri.wolfus at gmail.com> wrote:

> In the real world 0.81 < 0.89 and 0.810 = 0.81 :-P
> How about 0.891?
> 
> - Ofri
> 
> On 07/02/2006, at 23:06, Christopher Forsythe wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Feb 7, 2006, at 2:37 PM, David Smith wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Feb 7, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Christopher Forsythe
> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 7, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Evan Schoenberg
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Does anyone have any other major bugs which
> need addressing in what
> >>>> really should be the last 0.8x release (since
> if it isn't, what're
> >>>> we calling the next one? ;) ) or the like?  If
> not, this should be
> >>>> a short beta run since the MSN change has been
> extensively tested
> >>>> in the above ticket and the Jabber change,
> though far-reaching,
> >>>> turned out to be a one-liner.
> >>>
> >>> I thought the consensus when skipping .90 as a
> major release was to
> >>> use the .90 - .99 as security fixes/major bug
> fixes like we did  
> >>> the .
> >>> 8x series.
> >>>
> >>> Chris
> >>
> >> I certainly wasn't aware of it, if so. That seems
> like it would be
> >> rather confusing for users (although probably not
> as confusing as a
> >> 0.810).
> >>
> >> 													David
> >
> > How would it be confusing?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Adium-devl mailing list
> > Adium-devl at adiumx.com
> >
>
http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Adium-devl mailing list
> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
>
http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com
>