msn-pecan 0.1 good enough?

[Felipe Contreras]

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Darren Swan <thegundamguru at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm honestly tired of hearing about this. Felipe, you come across as
> immature and not willing to listen. I'm not going to take sides on whether
> or not msn-pecan should be included in Adium 1.X. I will however point out
> that this entire thread has been a huge waste of time. There are so many
> other things involved with BOTH sides of the argument that need to be sorted
> out before either side can consider working together. I'm not going to point
> out specific points, I'm solely going to request that this topic come to a
> close. The users of Adium are suffering in this as it is a waste of time and
> detracting attention from bugs that could be fixed.
> In my opinion, if you're going to support MSN within a third-party
> messenger, and I'm not being specific to any one messenger, you need to
> implement and support as many features of MSN as you possibly can. File
> Transfers, ability to talk to certain contacts, send animated smiley faces,
> it doesn't matter how small the feature, someone somewhere will be looking
> for it when they switch from using the first party program.

Ad hominem attacks. Awesome.

Your mail was a waste of time. I believe this thread is closed as
we've reached consensus: we will consider this for 1.5, at which point
the move to msn-pecan will be evaluated based on the status of
msn-pecan and the importance of the YIM feature.

And regarding your idealistic comment; yeah ideally every feature
should be implemented, but since we have limited resource we need to
prioritize. You can see the prioritized tickets here:
http://code.google.com/p/msn-pecan/issues/list

You can cast your vote there. But as you can see it's pretty obvious
that the next items to work on are: an easier way to set personal
messages (in Pidgin), and support to login to multiple locations.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras