[Adium-devl] Sparkle 1.5b2 in 1.3 betas?

[Augie Fackler]

On Jun 30, 2008, at 1:50 AM, David Smith wrote:

> 	I think we should switch to Sparkle 1.5, but I also think we should
> not do so for 1.3. So, one vote against including new stuff in betas
> (again).

I'm also extremely -1 on shoehorning anything new into the betas.  
Let's ship this, and start working on the next release.

>
>
> On Jun 29, 2008, at 10:30 PM, Peter Hosey wrote:
>
>> Andy Matuschak released Sparkle 1.5b2 today:
>>
>> 	http://andymatuschak.org/articles/2008/06/29/sparkle-15b2/
>>
>> What do you think about replacing Sparkle Plus with Sparkle 1.5 in
>> Adium 1.3? It includes the Sparkle Plus feature, along with many
>> fixes:
>>
>> https://launchpad.net/sparkle/+milestone/1.5
>>
>> Development is also *much* more active on Sparkle than on Sparkle
>> Plus.
>>
>> Switching to Sparkle 1.5 in Adium 1.3 would benefit Sparkle even more
>> than it benefits us: Being in two Adium betas is probably *the* best
>> way for Sparkle 1.5 to get a lot of beta testing. Hopefully, we can
>> help make sure that 1.5 is bug-free when it goes final.
>>
>> I did say “two Adium betas”. That's because we would need to
>> release one Adium beta with Sparkle 1.5b2 so that our users have it,
>> and then another Adium beta to prove that it works.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Adium-devl mailing list
>> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
>> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Adium-devl mailing list
> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2417 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20080630/d40a55b4/attachment.p7s>