[Adium-devl] Sparkle 1.5b2 in 1.3 betas?

[David Smith]

	I think we should switch to Sparkle 1.5, but I also think we should  
not do so for 1.3. So, one vote against including new stuff in betas  
(again).

On Jun 29, 2008, at 10:30 PM, Peter Hosey wrote:

> Andy Matuschak released Sparkle 1.5b2 today:
>
> 	http://andymatuschak.org/articles/2008/06/29/sparkle-15b2/
>
> What do you think about replacing Sparkle Plus with Sparkle 1.5 in
> Adium 1.3? It includes the Sparkle Plus feature, along with many  
> fixes:
>
> https://launchpad.net/sparkle/+milestone/1.5
>
> Development is also *much* more active on Sparkle than on Sparkle  
> Plus.
>
> Switching to Sparkle 1.5 in Adium 1.3 would benefit Sparkle even more
> than it benefits us: Being in two Adium betas is probably *the* best
> way for Sparkle 1.5 to get a lot of beta testing. Hopefully, we can
> help make sure that 1.5 is bug-free when it goes final.
>
> I did say “two Adium betas”. That's because we would need to
> release one Adium beta with Sparkle 1.5b2 so that our users have it,
> and then another Adium beta to prove that it works.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Adium-devl mailing list
> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com