[Adium-devl] GSoC 2007 student branches

[David Smith]

On May 30, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Colin Barrett wrote:

> On May 30, 2007, at 8:14 AM, Evan Schoenberg wrote:
>>
>> On May 30, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Colin Barrett wrote:
>>
>>> I would not be opposed to doing this after it has gotten significant
>>> testing. Part of the problem with 1.0.3 was bumping libpurple.
>>> However, using *only* released versions of libpurple, plus perhaps a
>>> (very) small, known set of patches we've apply, would definitely  
>>> be a
>>> policy I would support.
>>
>> That's what I was angling towards - we should be using releases of
>> our libraries wherever possible.
>>
>> I definitely wasn't saying we should move to libpurple 2.0.1 and
>> simply release -- our own quality control and beta process still
>> needs to be in effect.  If someone is interested in handling a 1.0.5
>> beta... or, for that matter, a 1.1 beta... after updating to
>> libpurple 2.0.1, I think that ball should be gotten rolling.
>
> How large is the diff between what we have now and 2.0.1?
>
> -Colin

	1.0.4's libpurple -> libpurple 2.0.1 will get us some rather nice  
bug fixes. Trunk already has the best of the lot.

							David