[Adium-devl] GSoC 2007 student branches
Colin Barrett
timber at lava.net
Wed May 30 15:28:27 UTC 2007
On May 30, 2007, at 8:14 AM, Evan Schoenberg wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Colin Barrett wrote:
>
>> I would not be opposed to doing this after it has gotten significant
>> testing. Part of the problem with 1.0.3 was bumping libpurple.
>> However, using *only* released versions of libpurple, plus perhaps a
>> (very) small, known set of patches we've apply, would definitely be a
>> policy I would support.
>
> That's what I was angling towards - we should be using releases of
> our libraries wherever possible.
>
> I definitely wasn't saying we should move to libpurple 2.0.1 and
> simply release -- our own quality control and beta process still
> needs to be in effect. If someone is interested in handling a 1.0.5
> beta... or, for that matter, a 1.1 beta... after updating to
> libpurple 2.0.1, I think that ball should be gotten rolling.
How large is the diff between what we have now and 2.0.1?
-Colin
More information about the devel
mailing list