[Adium-devl] Leopard Tickets

[Chris Forsythe]

That brings up another point, how long after 10.5 is out is everyone 
going to upgrade to it so that we can switch the project over to xcode 
3? I plan to get a macbook pro shortly and upgrade asap on it, but is 
anyone going to stragle on it?

Chris

David Smith wrote:

>Ahhh, then yes, I will be setting that up unless someone else does.
>
>On Jun 13, 2007, at 9:53 PM, k.gillard.10 at scu.edu.au wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I never said anything about releasing a binary... all I suggested  
>>was we maintain a seperate, isolated repository from trunk with  
>>patches that fix incompatibilities with Leopard.
>>
>>Kiel
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: David Smith <catfish.man at gmail.com>
>>Date: Thursday, June 14, 2007 12:33 pm
>>Subject: Re: [Adium-devl] Leopard Tickets
>>To: k.gillard.10 at scu.edu.au, Adium Development mailing list <adium-devl at adiumx.com 
>>    
>>
>>>Kiel, we covered this earlier in the thread. We can't release
>>>any
>>>binaries built from this tree without violating our license (and
>>>more
>>>importantly libpurple's).
>>>
>>>David
>>>
>>>On Jun 13, 2007, at 7:17 PM, k.gillard.10 at scu.edu.au wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Why don't we set up a closed, private repository that allows
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Leopard
>>>      
>>>
>>>>developers to apply patches to improve Adium's compatibility?
>>>>
>>>>For example, Catfish_Man could maintain a local
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>repository
>>>      
>>>
>>>>accessible only to him and he could receive patches from
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Leopard
>>>      
>>>
>>>>devs improving Adium's compatibility. This would bypass the
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>problem
>>>      
>>>
>>>>of it violating NDA, etc, right? The code wouldn't be
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>accessible to
>>>      
>>>
>>>>the outside world.
>>>>
>>>>Kiel
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: Evan Schoenberg <evan.s at dreskin.net>
>>>>Date: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:33 am
>>>>Subject: Re: [Adium-devl] Leopard Tickets
>>>>To: Adium Development mailing list <adium-devl at adiumx.com>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>On Jun 13, 2007, at 8:12 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>Is there any way to have sparkle signal a mandatory update?
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>Basically> sparkle would warn that a critical upgrade is
>>>>>available and that
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>whatever the current version of Adium will not run, and
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>refuse to
>>>      
>>>
>>>>>>run, on 10.5. I realise it is a bit of a harsh approach, but
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>it is
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>certainly another one to choose from.
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>I don't think that's either necessary or a good plan -- one
>>>>>can
>>>>>certainly run with features disabled, whatever those features
>>>>>may be.
>>>>>Any request for support for anyone on 10.5 is going to be met
>>>>>with
>>>>>"please upgrade to the latest version" no matter what the
>>>>>problem is :)
>>>>>
>>>>>-Evan
>>>>>