[Adium-devl] [Adium-svn] rev 20150 - branches/adium-1.0/Release

[Evan Schoenberg]

On Jul 8, 2007, at 11:22 PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:

> 	OK, b4 as amended in a later commit... but if still a beta, don't  
> we need to address it as such? Why define it to false above?

Poorly named variable.  AIAdiumProtocol.h still defines it as a beta  
(#define BETA_RELEASE TRUE) which means it uses the beta appcast.   
The variable in the makefile determines whether it builds in  
Deployment-Debug with modifiable nibs and old-style strings files or  
in Deployment with all space-saving measures in place.  The last beta  
is built in Deployment (removing the debug window, as well) so as to  
match exactly the actual release.

> 	Also, I'm only getting a two entries list in the Sparkle ChangeLog  
> we get through the update check in the Adium menu, but I know from  
> r20154 that the list is really much larger. Is some URL pointed in  
> the wrong direction?

You're seeing the changes for moving from 1.0.5b3 to 1.0.5b4.  r20154  
is changes from 1.0.4 to 1.0.5.

-Evan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20070709/1275044b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20070709/1275044b/attachment.sig>