[Adium-devl] Adium Source page edit

[Chris Forsythe]

I'd like the blog post to be held off until we have 1.0 out the door, as 
sort of a followup if you guys don't mind. We've already sold joscar to 
the userbase, and calling off on it prior to a release will end up being 
a possible bigger headache than we need for it.

So wiki page to resolve the issue that was brought up initially, and 
then a blog post to bring closure to it and smack integration.

Thoughts on that?

Chris

Augie Fackler wrote:

>How's this:
>I'll do both a blog post about the change and make notes in the wiki.
>
>On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:50 PM, disposable at infinitenexus.com wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I think the wiki page is the best solution as it codifies it as a  
>>part of our overall documentation and not simply via a news mechanism.
>>
>>- brian 'bgannin' ganninger
>>
>>
>>On Dec 12, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Peter Hosey wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>On Dec 12, 2006, at 12:09:31, Christopher Forsythe wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I think a new page about joscar, the reasons why we switched to  
>>>>it, and the reasons why we're switching away would be nice.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>I think it should be a blog post, and both of the joscar blog  
>>>posts (the existing one and the new one) should link to each other.
>>>
>>>Once that's done, all references to joscar can be excised from the  
>>>wiki, since the past version of those pages will preserve those  
>>>references.
>>>      
>>>