[Adium-devl] Java-based libraries... a ponder, a thought, an apology

[Andreas Monitzer]

On Dec 08, 2006, at 16:05, Chris Forsythe wrote:

> But we'd still have to maintain the library, which I don't think we  
> have
> the long term resources to do.

the libgaim-based one hasn't been maintained at all, why do you think  
that would change then?

> If it's just as much work to make the libgaim implementation all  
> happy,

as in "rewrite"

> I'd say we should do that and improve it for both clients at the same
> time, at least from a resource perspective that seems like it would be
> better in general.

Well, I'm not really happy about C-based implementations, since  
they'd mean a lot of work, and libxml is kinda complicated to use. I  
don't think I'd be able to do that in 3 months (when I'd want to  
implement some XEPs, too).

andy