Twitter in Adium
Robert Vehse
robertvehse at fastmail.fm
Thu Mar 21 18:04:46 UTC 2013
Am 21.03.2013 um 05:08 schrieb Frank D <fdowsett at gmail.com>:
> With Twitter switching to the 1.1 API and shutting down 1.0, I've
> upgraded Adium's support to work with it.
Yay! Thanks a lot.
> […]
> * I forked STTwitter on GitHub on my account, we could (and maybe
> should) fork it on the Adium account.
I can think of two reasons why it could be beneficial to fork it on the Adium account: 1. everyone on the team can easily modify it, 2. they might appreciate our official endorsement of the framework (especially with all the improvements you made).
> I've also disabled Laconica/StatusNet support as it doesn't look like
> many people use it in Adium and upgrading the framework to support it
> would be more work.
No objections
> I've got the changes committed in both 1.7 and 1.6 and will transplant
> back to 1.5.7 after a little testing has been done. Let's find those
> regressions!
Good idea! I'll try to help though I have to say I only use a very small part of the Twitter functionality.
Am 21.03.2013 um 13:14 schrieb Moses Lei <bugs at moseslei.net>:
> Why not keep MGTwitterEngine for StatusNet/Laconica? As far as I know, it still works, yes, since they are still on some variant of API 1.0?
>
> Moses
Seems like it's a bit large of a dependency for a service hardly anyone uses. Plus, someone would need to maintain it and I feel like we should ship services we are committed to maintaining (apart from those in lib purple).
Cheers,
Robbie
More information about the devel
mailing list