1.5.4

[Jack Erwin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks, Evan.  I will get a couple of servers set up and get back to
you soon.

Regards,
Jack


On Tue 02 Oct 2012 12:55:46 PM MDT, Evan Kinney wrote:
> Here you go:
>
> http://nightly.adium.im/adium-adium-1.5.4/Adium_1.5.4b1r5099.dmg
>
> And instructions on how to get it to dump the debug log to a file, if you need it (I'd like to see the output, if possible):
> http://trac.adium.im/wiki/CurrentAdiumDebug
>
> The guys in the ticket were running 10.8.0, but as far as I can tell, no changes were made to the CDSA stuff between then and 10.8.2 that would change how it responds.
>
> Thanks again for your offer to assist!
>
> /ek
>
> On Oct 2, 2012, at 1:20 PM, "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr at cisco.com>
>  wrote:
>
>> On 10/2/12 10:55 AM, "Robert Vehse" <robertvehse at fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Am 01.10.2012 um 09:02 schrieb Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr):
>>>
>>>> The WebEx Connect XMPP servers were generating the issue, but we've
>>>> since
>>>> upgraded TLS stacks so it doesn't happen anymore.  If you can't find a
>>>> server to repro on, let me know, and I'll have someone try an old build
>>>> in
>>>> the lab.
>>>
>>> So how should we proceed? Should the patch still be considered? Is this a
>>> server-side issue and if so, should it be worked around?
>>
>> There are other versions of our server out in the wild that have the same
>> issue, that we can't get upgraded as easily.  As such, yes, the patch
>> would still be nice.
>>
>> I just talked to Jack Erwin, who owns this team at Cisco.  He said that if
>> you sent us a build of Adium containing the fix, we could have our QA
>> department run it against the old version of our server in our lab to
>> prove that the fix works.  I'd expect them to write a couple of bullets
>> about what they tested and how it worked.
>>
>> You'd have to trust them for their results, but we're the ones harmed if
>> they mess it up.
>>
>> --
>> Joe Hildebrand
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQa1DnAAoJEDOHWSHcqgkSUUoIAJiWIGa7GYGx8D/W5GiJTXRH
K8TAeuLMHZa+gYOkpQsqAD+VfPoptn+pzcRJu2QQy59k53zaGP8rEaA96fLLfcFt
a/DJ5RdIqCpo8oRDFrwXcQFSR5F6CncfrELn+BWKwRInMTb9rSIUEJeRSe6Ku+SO
Qmi2C72YDa0nFDRYJe4lrtz5VSN1P/jkAxYY7qnxHvwz2J1EYKL7MKVoElRiX3jb
IvA2XEKKcRmAN1cdLfBFHGQyHy/W2lngUkvq1bbitmS1cdNMgITzGanOMaIcBL8D
iAQDe2U5ZGHA99RP2J90pyQwwZUYtiMDEKzilfqizYuE8kr1t9VhffUqgccAY5U=
=PjZN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----