Twitter: To be or not to be!

[Colin Barrett]

Maybe "International" instead of "Regional"? (Less negative.)

Otherwise, +1

-Colin (via thumbs)

On Feb 8, 2012, at 4:47 PM, "Evan Schoenberg, M.D." <evan at adium.im> wrote:

> 
> On Feb 7, 2012, at 10:08 PM, Eric Richie wrote:
> 
>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:44 PM, George Lambrou wrote:
>> 
>>> -1. We shouldn't advocate things Adium's not good at.
>>> 
>>> Twitter support is fairly basic at the moment, and we don't want users to expect fantastic Twitter support, not get it, and then hate Adium because of it.
>> 
>> Devil's Advocate: Facebook is in the top grouping, and that has become (arguably) one of our most problematic services based on user complaints. (Even though many of them have nothing to do with Adium itself.)
> 
> I think that's different, because we are a quite good Facebook chat client.  We're not bad at Twitter, but I'd rather keep the Twitter app open separately, which probably says something.
> 
> Chris wrote:
>> That list is getting pretty long, maybe there's a better way to group them up front other than just a straight up list? "Social Networking" for instance for twitter and facebook.
> 
> In all seriousness, I do like this suggestion, at least on first blush. Here's a suggested reorganization:
> 
> Instant Messaging
> AOL Instant Messeger
> Google Talk
> ICQ
> Jabber (XMPP)
> MSN Messenger
> MobileMe
> Yahoo! Messenger
> 
> Social Networking
> Facebook
> LiveJournal
> MyspaceIM
> StatusNet
> Twitter
> 
> Corporate
> Lotus Sametime
> Novell GroupWise
> 
> Regional
> Gadu-Gadu
> Yahoo! Japan
> 
> Other
> Bonjour
> SIP / SIMPLE
> 
> -Evan
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20120210/ff38fd0c/attachment-0002.html>