Time to kick out libpurple.framework?

[Christopher Forsythe]

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Christopher Forsythe <chris at growl.info>wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Alan Humpherys <alangh at adium.im> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Ryan Govostes wrote:
>>
>> > Definitely yes.
>> >
>> > I am strongly opposed to the original decision to move binaries to
>> trunk. I encountered a number of build errors when the switch occurred, and
>> it prevents me from tweaking my compiler and SDK settings as I like, without
>> a great deal of work.
>> >
>> > Let's move back to source for all of the frameworks, using
>> subrepositories. If we can do a read-only mirror of the im.adium.adium
>> branch of libpurple to our repo that'd be great.
>> >
>> > Ryan
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I  agree
>>
>>
> Once pidgin goes to mercurial, can libpurple be pulled in as just a subrepo
> and make this even easier?
>
>
Oh bah, I reread the original post, and then see mercurial (and get it
pointed out to me by 2 people right after).

+1 :)

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20110329/c9037815/attachment-0002.html>