Re: More Icon Revisions for 1.4…
George Lambrou
georgelambrou721 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 13 02:44:35 UTC 2010
On Jul 12, 10, at 9.03 pm, Peter Hosey wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2010, at 14:58:07, George Lambrou wrote:
>> <Confirmations (Glowing Sign).png><Glow (Normal).png><Glow (Focus).png>
>
> Good, but I prefer the pair of arrows you had before (included with the new highlighter). Those arrows on this background = win.
I didn't really like the way those arrows turned out, so I tried to find a midpoint in this one; good?
>
>> <Confirmations (Split Sign).png><Two-Tone (Normal).png><Two-Tone (Focus).png>
>
> I don't like this.
Personally, I like the two-tone over any of the others; something about the glowing arrows just doesn't sit right with me. The split sign retains the yes-or-no aspect of the glowing arrows while (to my eyes) achieving a more natural look.
George Lambrou
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20100712/f0708668/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Confirmations (Glowing Sign).png
Type: image/png
Size: 1529 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20100712/f0708668/attachment.png>
More information about the devel
mailing list