Adium 1.4b18/1.3.11?

[Colin Barrett]

This plan sound good to me. I've moved and my schedule has calmed down enough that I can probably squeeze in some time. I'll track down Steve Holt and we can knock our brains together.

-Colin

On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. wrote:

> 
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Alan Humpherys wrote:
> 
>> I must confess to being a complete novice when it comes to integration of a new libpurple version into our code base, but seeing the relatively large numbers of patches which are necessary to fix security and compatibility issues in our existing version, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to pull the new version of the library and do both a 1.3.11 and a 1.4B18 release with it.  (Of course, I defer to the experts on the wisdom of that path).  
> 
> Doing a major libpurple version upgrade on the 1.3 branch would be a large undertaking; I definitely don't think it's worth doing.  A minimal release with the plucked changes to fix some protocol breakages seems reasonable, and it should easy enough to do.
> 
>> I know that I haven't been active in the project, but have some time over the next weeks that I can invest.  (It would also be great if I had a more experienced expert to collaborate with.)  I really think we need to push hard and get a completed 1.4 out the door.
> 
> I fully agree.  What we need is a deadline; 1.4 has languished long enough, and the fact of the matter is that fixing every bug is simply an impossible goal.  
> 
> I propose Thursday, May 13.  It's a largely selfish date: I'll have a couple days prior in which I am free to focus on nothing but hacking on Adium, and since I have company in town that weekend (and every other weekend in May) I don't want to release on or immediately before the weekend. 
> 
> Let's ship.  The momentum we gain - both for ourselves, seeing a major release finally moving, and from the outside as folks see how much we've accomplished - will make 1.4.1 a much easier goal than 1.4 was.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -Evan
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Let me know how I can best help,
>> 
>> Alan
>> --
>> alangh at adium.im
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 20, 2010, at 10:11 PM, John Bailey wrote:
>> 
>>> On 04/20/2010 11:22 PM, Eric Richie wrote:
>>>> Are there any outstanding issues other than the Y! thing (and maybe the MSN security patch) that we would need to take care of for 1.3.11?
>>> 
>>> Gadu-Gadu support in the libpurple 2.5.9 included in Adium 1.3.10 is quite
>>> deficient as well, due to the bundled libgadu being practically prehistoric.  It
>>> looks like the following revisions from the im.pidgin.adium.1-4 branch would
>>> need to be plucked (if cleanly possible) to the im.pidgin.adium.1-3 branch to
>>> fix both Gadu-Gadu and Yahoo! JAPAN:
>>> 
>>> e6348335d02982e12c2be1a30517d7ea46569c51
>>> 48c2553ef4b46482b26f021c97d2569c1b053227
>>> 6a525a20cfffe39369fb58b72aeaf5194aa468d9
>>> 692d75f8dc28e433931f5a4b036c145f132c42ba
>>> 91e41e5288f7f90048a8cf7d05bedc87aacfa3de
>>> 47085b9fe64551b697ca9ba601b8c0323e47c449
>>> 
>>> I have not yet tried to apply these revisions to the adium.1-3 branch.  I don't
>>> see a point in doing that until there's a decision about whether a 1.3.11 is
>>> necessary.  Also, I'm not sure what revision would be necessary for the MSN
>>> security fix mentioned.  If someone does know, I'd be happy to pluck it across
>>> with the others listed above when a decision is reached.
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>