Sound cache: Do we actually need it?
Chris Forsythe
chris at growl.info
Sun May 10 14:46:24 UTC 2009
I have a 10.4 800 mhz g4, would that work? If so your changes would
need to be 10.4 compatible, but I'd be happy to try it.
Chris
On May 10, 2009, at 12:50 AM, David Smith wrote:
> I was experimentally switching our sound cache over to use
> <censored 10.6-only API> to see how it worked in actual usage, and I
> realized that I'm not sure anymore if we need it. Would someone with
> a slower machine (5400rpm disk preferably, PPC preferably) be
> willing to try using sounds heavily on a non-caching build of Adium
> and see if it lags at all? It's possible NSSound is caching for us
> and we can simplify.
>
> David
>
More information about the devel
mailing list