"Adium-devl" subject mangling

[Matt Handley]

"It belongs in a museum!"

I'm with Zac and vote no, for however much my vote counts.

Matt

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Christopher Forsythe <chris at growl.info> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Eric Richie <eric at adium.im> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Zachary West <zacw at adium.im> wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 02:40, Zachary West <zacw at adium.im> wrote:
>> >> Top-right corner on the message [dropdown] > Filter messages like
>> >> these.
>> >>
>> >> It fills in the rest for you automatically, with the list name and
>> >> such.
>> >>
>> >> Zac
>> >>
>> >
>> > For the record, this does:
>> >
>> > Has the words: list:"devel_adium.im.adium.im"
>> >
>> > Where "…" is the List-Id header's explicit value (inside the <>). I
>> > have never seen Mailing-List before, but I know Google Groups sends
>> > both it and List-Id. List-Id appears to be the standard, therefore:
>> > hoorah List-Id.
>> >
>> > Zac
>> >
>> >
>>
>> We went through this whole thing before and decided that people liked
>> having them.  I have yet to hear a good argument against them other
>> than the standard rant about them being "old".
>>
>> -Eric
>>
>
> I'd like to vote to keep them too. Just because it's a relic from the past,
> doesn't mean it's a bad relic from the past. Indiana Jones fought snakes and
> giant rolling death balls to gather relics, why do we want to jetison them
> now as well?
>