[Adium-devl] Sparkle 1.5b2 in 1.3 betas?

[Eric Richie]

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Augie Fackler <durin42 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Jun 30, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Eric Richie wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Zachary West <zacwest at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Augie Fackler <durin42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Jun 30, 2008, at 1:50 AM, David Smith wrote:
>> >>        I think we should switch to Sparkle 1.5, but I also think we
>> should
>> >> not do so for 1.3. So, one vote against including new stuff in betas
>> >> (again).
>> >
>> > I'm also extremely -1 on shoehorning anything new into the betas. Let's
>> ship
>> > this, and start working on the next release.
>> >
>>
>> Thirded; I'd rather not include a beta Sparkle in a release as well.
>> Let another set of people deal with the regression testing; we've
>> already had one bombed release from Sparkle-ish problems.
>>
>
> *Adds his voice to the choir*
>
> We should definitely do it, however it needs to wait.  We're already
> sitting on a release so let's just focus on getting that fixed up so we can
> go back to playing with new shineys.
>
>
> Speaking of new shineys, I've got a feature I want to work on - do we have
> any idea how close we are to branching for 1.3 so that trunk can be 1.4?
>

Tough to say.  The roadmap still has 26 open issues.  I'll make some time to
look through some of those to see what we can bump.

-Eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20080630/50a5717e/attachment-0001.html>