[Adium-devl] Sparkle 1.5b2 in 1.3 betas?

Eric Richie edr1084 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 30 13:58:59 UTC 2008


On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Zachary West <zacwest at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Augie Fackler <durin42 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 30, 2008, at 1:50 AM, David Smith wrote:
> >>        I think we should switch to Sparkle 1.5, but I also think we
> should
> >> not do so for 1.3. So, one vote against including new stuff in betas
> >> (again).
> >
> > I'm also extremely -1 on shoehorning anything new into the betas. Let's
> ship
> > this, and start working on the next release.
> >
>
> Thirded; I'd rather not include a beta Sparkle in a release as well.
> Let another set of people deal with the regression testing; we've
> already had one bombed release from Sparkle-ish problems.
>

*Adds his voice to the choir*

We should definitely do it, however it needs to wait.  We're already sitting
on a release so let's just focus on getting that fixed up so we can go back
to playing with new shineys.

-Eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20080630/377e955d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the devel mailing list