[Adium-devl] msn-pecan status update?

Evan Schoenberg evan.s at dreskin.net
Mon Jul 28 23:28:56 UTC 2008


On Jul 28, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:

> First of all I need to know which versions of msn-pecan correspond to
> your version of Adium; I see reports of 1.3b9 but I don't know the
> msn-pecan version, similarly with svn builds. If I could find that out
> from the svn code that would certainly help.

1.3b9 is [24466] (per the About Adium window, beta.adiumx.com, or svn  
log adium/Plists)

svn log adium/Frameworks/libpurple.framework/ shows that  
libpurple.framework last changed msn-pecan at [24436]:  
im.pidgin.pidgin 2.5.0mtn @ 2dfa29ca with msn-pecan 0.0.14-63-g23fd241.

libpurple.framework's commit messages should always contain the  
im.pidgin.pidgin and msn-pecan revisions unless there was no change  
(e.g. the series of commits which were me iterating on fixing an ICQ  
issue and providing builds to testers).

> I know it sounds pedantic but many issues are impossible to fix
> without the right information:
> * version of msn-pecan
> * debug log

Definitely not pedantic. Very reasonable.

> In the case of crashes:
> * backtrace of the crash *with* debugging symbols [1]

Running in gdb gets you a backtrace; it doesn't add debugging symbols  
unless the person has compiled his/her own libpurple.framework and  
kept the object files around.  So far as I can tell this is the only  
way debugging symbols can stay around; I see no way to include them in  
the libpurple.framework binary itself.

If anyone can figure out a way to keep the debug symbols in the  
binary, it'd definitely be worth the space tradeoff to do that for our  
beta builds.  Alternately, if we can get a DWARF file to actually be  
created-as-requested and then distribute that to testers, that'd work,  
too... assuming that one can tell gdb where to go looking for the file.

I'd also like to point out #10411 which you didn't mention in your  
ticket list; it appears to be a problem new to msn-pecan, at least  
based on the reports, and it's a significant issue.

Cheers,
Evan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20080728/ce08cf4a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20080728/ce08cf4a/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list