[Adium-devl] [Adium-svn] rev 22094 - in trunk: Frameworks/Adium Framework/Source Resources
Evan Schoenberg
evan.s at dreskin.net
Wed Jan 2 07:19:37 UTC 2008
On Jan 2, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Peter Hosey wrote:
> On Jan 01, 2008, at 22:55:50, evands at adiumx.com wrote:
>> … fixes confusion of account refs which would happen if two had the
>> same UID (even on different servicse) previously.
>
> The idea of the way we had it, as stated by the comment, was that it
> would be specific to a given service—i.e., the specifier would be
> for “account "foo at bar.com" of service "Jabber"”. Was this not working?
Oh, I see. It's less broken than I thought, but still broken. Two
AIAccount objects with the same UID and service could exist; using a
UID/service combination can't disambiguate them, whereas the
internalObjectID does.
> I do notice that in r22005, “account "foo at bar.com"” returns an
> account rather than raising an error, which is certainly a bug. But
> that's different: the service is missing from the reference, which
> should be an error whenever the account specifier is ambiguous
I don't understand what you're pointing out here.
Cheers,
Evan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20080102/3ccd59b9/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list