[Adium-devl] 10.5
Evan Schoenberg
evan.s at dreskin.net
Wed Aug 13 11:05:46 UTC 2008
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:18 PM, Colin Barrett wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2008, at 3:27 PM, David Smith wrote:
>
>> GCC 4.2/GCC-LLVM (not sure if there's any benefit for us here. 4.2
>> might have some better warnings and such)
>
> Codegen and compile time in 4.2 are significantly better, and gcc-llvm
> is better on top of that. I would say it's pretty worth it.
>
> I am in favor of more aggressive dropping of older operating systems.
> Adium is a free product developed by a bunch of volunteers in our
> spare time for fun. Anything that makes things unfun (operating
> systems we don't use, for example) should be terminated with maximum
> prejudice. Old versions will continue to work, life will go on.
This could go back and forth forever, but the longer it does, the more
so the current trend will continue, I think: The arguments for
continuing 10.4 support grow weaker and weaker. We're not telling our
10.4 users to stop using Adium, and the only component of Adium which
might break suddenly due to external causes -- libpurple -- can be
updated individually with minimal effort.
Having begun programming for the iPhone, I have fallen in love with
the new obj-c syntax and conveniences -- imagine never writing a
simple getter/setter pair for an ivar again! Love, love.
I do think that we should strongly consider backporting of key updates
once known to be stable; one, for example, will be msnp15.
There's good stuff in 10.5, possibilities which will improve Adium and
be enjoyable to code. Pull the trigger. Let's have some fun.
Cheers,
Evan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20080813/28986109/attachment.sig>
More information about the devel
mailing list