[Adium-devl] No more subject line mangling for Adium-devl

[Augie Fackler]

On Oct 8, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Peter Hosey wrote:

> On Oct 08, 2007, at 02:40:37, Colin Barrett wrote:
>> An explicit reply-to header should not be set.
>
> Lies.

I concur on this - I prefer the reply-to header. I've never seen a  
good rationale for why we shouldn't set such a header.

>
>> Alternately, it should set an intelligent one (list and anyone CC'd).
>
> This seems like a good way to get lots of duplicate mails.
>
> When we reply to a message on the list, don't we only want to reply  
> to the list *99%* of the time? We don't bring the Pidgin guys or  
> anyone else into it that often, and when we do, *then* we can use  
> Reply All.

+1 to streamlining the common use case.

> _______________________________________________
> Adium-devl mailing list
> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com