[Adium-devl] GSoC 2007 student branches

Colin Barrett timber at lava.net
Wed May 30 21:06:33 UTC 2007


On May 30, 2007, at 12:41 PM, Michael wrote:

> Colin Barrett wrote:
>>
>> So push 1.0.5 beta now with purple changes, and leave it in beta  
>> until 1.1 and then do a dual release? Sounds pretty good, but: Are  
>> there semantics in sparkle for not upgrading someone who is on an  
>> OS we no longer support? If not, we'll need to do 1.0.5 anyway to  
>> add that. We don't want a 10.3 user having Adium be horked because  
>> they download 1.1.
>>
>> How did we do this for 0.89.1 -> 1.0?
>>
>> -Colin
>>
>>
> Yes, a dual release. Or 1.0.5 shortly after 1.1 but only for 10.3  
> users as the others will have skipped/moved to 1.1.

I don't want to get into the headache of having 1.0.5 come out after  
1.1. That just doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

1.1.0 and 1.0.5 should be either simultaneous or 1.0.5 should come out  
first. IMO.

> I don't know about Sparkle's inner workings, I believe this will be  
> the first time Adium hits this as -IIRC- Sparkle was introduced in  
> 1.0 (betas).

Nope, 'cause we offered an update to 0.89.1 people, no? So we must  
have had some way of not offering it or telling 10.2.8 people to screw  
off :P

-Colin




More information about the devel mailing list