[Adium-devl] Adium 1.1 next?

[Chris Forsythe]

Evan Schoenberg wrote:

>
> On Mar 26, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Chris Forsythe wrote:
>
>> Let's hit 1.1, and if there is a lot of problems left with 1.0.2 we can 
>>
>> come back to it and resolve those for 10.3 users as best we can.
>>
> My only problem with a 1.0.3 /after/ 1.1 is that it could be 
> confusing; it'd be nice to stay strictly linear.  That doesn't mean 
> that this can't be the way we think of development ("come back to 
> 1.0.3 if needed")... though I've already committed a couple changes 
> that should be in the permanent 10.3-user record (chat transcript 
> viewer now shows bold properly; the stupid Spell Checker Likes To 
> Throw Exceptions crashes will no longer be crashes as 
> AIExceptionController will ignore them) and I'd really like to have 
> Gaim 2.0.0 final in 1.0.3 if the timing works -- I'm not a huge fan of 
> us using a beta version of libgaim in our releases.
>

Do we have any kind of timeline on Gaim 2.0.0 final? I mean, beyond the 
"when it's done"?

>
>> The rest of 1.1 is getting tabs to where they need 
>>
>> to be. Personally I could see switching the tabs to a source list rather 
>>
>> than side tabs when set to the left or right.
>>
> Definitely; I think you and I discussed that online a while back.  
> /People/ on the left/right makes sense... the UI looking like tabs in 
> that configuration doesn't so much, but replace that with a source 
> list (which I think is within the realm of what PSMTabBarControl could 
> be expanded to handle) and it could be pretty sweet.  One thing to 
> keep in mind is the interaction with group chats... in that situation, 
> I think a source list with Colloquy-style twiddles for the user lists 
> would be nice.  If a group chat SoC project is accepted, perhaps that 
> could be considered in UI enhancements.
>
That's definitely part of where this is coming from. David had a crazy 
idea of putting group chats in the contact list, sort of in that style.

>> I can also see contact list docking moving out of advanced in 1.1 or 1.2.
>>
> The only obnoxious part of that is the localization stuff, really; 
> easy otherwise.  Agreed that it should be in the mainstream :)


If it's too much of a pain in 1.1, let's get that one done in 1.2.

Chris