[Adium-devl] (1.0b22 == 1.0rc1)

[Christopher Forsythe]

On Jan 9, 2007, at 4:20 PM, Colin Barrett wrote:

> On Jan 9, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Evan Schoenberg wrote:
>
>> Any objections to 1.0b22 being a silent release candidate plus debug
>> logging, followed by a 1.0b23 which will match but have debug
>> logging turned off (as the release does), with an actual release by
>> the end of next week?

oh hell yes

>
> Are we ready to release, form an infrastructure standpoint? What about
> any sort of hyping/advertising/marketing we want to do? Is 0.89.2
> still going to come out concurrently for 10.3 users?
>

I'm setting up with an interview at TAB, and we're also going to have  
something on TUAW regarding 1.0, and the Fire stuff as well as soon  
as that gets posted.

I think our users are going to hype us to all hell to be honest.

.89.2 seems pointless now that I think about it. When I spoke to you  
about it, I failed to remember that the msn crash was only on Intel,  
which only has 10.4. Posting a .89.2 wouldn't help the 10.2 users one  
bit, so it's kind of pointless.

> Also, we aren't logging groupchats, which imajes pointed out. This is
> a regression from 0.89. I left it out intentionally because the group
> chat API wasn't robust enough to match up with the file name and UI
> and XML stuff I was doing. I was intending to fix it, but I've gotten
> busy. I also kind of forgot about it....

> That might be something we want to fix before doing 1.0.

At this point we have more fixes in 1.0 that we shouldn't be  
postponing unless we have a crasher. The group chat logging can be  
fixed at a later point, imho.

>
> We also might want to set a release day (feb 1?) just to let some hype
> build up.


We've had so much hype on the betas, I don't think we need anymore to  
be honest.

Chris