[Adium-devl] Sparkle Last Week

[Colin Barrett]

Why, exactly?

-Colin

On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:45 AM, David Smith wrote:

> I believe this has come up before, and we decided it was a bad idea.
>
> On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Zachary West wrote:
>
>> Wowsers!
>>
>> Last week we had nearly 800k submissions to Sparkle. Check out the
>> graphs! <http://adiumx.com/sparkle/?year=2007&week=33&graph=bar >
>> This week looks like it might turn out like last week too, with
>> 265k submissions already, in a 1.5day period!
>>
>> Would anybody feel it to be a huge privacy violation if we included
>> whether or not the user (instead of providing their anonymous
>> information) wants anonymous information submitted?
>>
>> That is, normal update check = no arguments sent
>> Update check & sends data = data sent
>> Update check & no send = &info=no
>>
>> Zac
>> _______________________________________________
>> Adium-devl mailing list
>> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
>> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Adium-devl mailing list
> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com