[Adium-devl] Doxygen vs. thindoc (was: Re: Bus factor)

[Augie Fackler]

It does not look (to me, anyway) like thindoc uses in-code  
documentation, which is what I'd like in the long run because then we  
can (relatively) easily see what is and isn't documented.
Augie

On Aug 1, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Peter Hosey wrote:

> On Aug 01, 2007, at 13:47:24, Augie Fackler wrote:
>> We have almost do doxygen.
>
> ?
>
> I'm not a big fan of Doxygen, mainly because it doesn't know about  
> use of categories as additions or informal protocols.
>
> wootest has a program called thindoc that he uses:
>
> 	http://waffle.wootest.net/2007/07/03/machtimer-thindoc/
> 	http://wafflesoftware.net/machtimer/documentation.thindoc.txt (input)
> 	http://wafflesoftware.net/machtimer/documentation.html (output)
>
> It isn't public yet, and I don't know whether it supports additions  
> or informal protocols yet.
>
> What do you guys think? Stay with Doxygen, or get wootest to  
> release it (and contribute changes to it, if necessary) and adopt  
> it instead of Doxygen?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Adium-devl mailing list
> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20070801/2077d0eb/attachment.sig>