[Adium-devl] Metacontact Plans for Adium 1.1
Colin Barrett
timber at lava.net
Fri Sep 29 02:25:10 UTC 2006
On Sep 28, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Augie Fackler wrote:
> I'm still a little hesitant on CK. I think things like CK will be
> less valuable as we start getting some of the more intricate VV
> things happening, but we'll burn that bridge when we come to it.
> *If* a good solution for that can be found without making multiple
> heads asplode, then I think we're OK. Perhaps consulting the Vorlon
> again will help with that.
I'm not sure I follow your logic here -- in fact, things like CK would
seem *more* valuable once VV starts getting involved. Want video and
audio conferencing in your app? CK offers that nearly for free. I
don't see how this is a Bad Thing. Either way, it's still a good idea
to re-organize the Adium API this way, regardless of what CK is doing
-- the CK stuff is just bonus points, really.
>> In general, I think this is a good idea, and would be a good excuse
>> to
>> clean up AIContactController.m (ugh). All the more reason we should
>> get started on this ASAP: i.e. branch for this as soon as we have an
>> API outline finalized.
>
> Excuse nothing, we'll *have* to make changes anyway, I say we fix as
> much of it as we can and take the black magic out while we're in
> there. I shouldn't be able to stare at an object for several B5 eps
> in a row and *still* have no concept of how it works internally.
> It's time for prettifying that particular block of code. With
> doxygenation.
By "excuse" I meant "motivation to touch that evil, evil hunk of code
that nobody sane would touch normally." Although I suppose none of us
are really 100% sane anyway (we *do* work on Adium ;)
-Colin
More information about the devel
mailing list