[Adium-devl] Trac complaints

[Chris Forsythe]

SimpleTicket looks like it's a must for us. We're using .10dev, 
coderanger I see that you branched for .10dev, think it'll work fine?

Regarding the blog, I'd think that it would be fine to have more geekery 
in the one we already have. I don't think I'll have time to hit that one 
though on trac this time around in either case.

Chris



Colin Barrett wrote:

> Here's my list.
>
> TracBlogPlugin - Requies TracTags which would be kinda useful, I  
> guess. I think it would be useful to have a more development-oriented  
> blog, rather than something that thousands and thousands of users 
> read  for news and stuff.
>
> http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/SimpleTicketPlugin WE MUST GET THIS OMG  
> *foams at mouth*
>
> That's about it. Are we going to be able to hack on trac (heh) in the  
> future? I wouldn't mind playing around with it.
>
> -Colin
>
>
> On Aug 31, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Chris Forsythe wrote:
>
>> So, barring the spam+anonymous user disabled issue, I'd like to get  
>> some
>> feedback about what's good and bad about Trac. In about 3 weeks I'll
>> have time to start working on getting some trac plugins/scripts/ whatnot
>> installed, and wanted to get the feedback now so I'd know what  everyone
>> would like.
>>
>> I've also cc'd coderanger, who is a regular in #trac and also hacks on
>> trac plugins and other things. He may be able to point us in the right
>> direction on some things.
>>
>> My current plans of what is going to be installed:
>>
>> http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/RepoSearchPlugin - Allows us to search the
>> codebase.
>>
>> http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/AccountManagerPlugin - Allows users to
>> register, at that point we wouldn't need anonymous access.
>>
>> For the curious, this page lists a ton of things we could possibly
>> add-on: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki
>>
>>
>>
>> Chris
>