[Adium-devl] Jingle, Sip and IAX2 in one step
Christopher Forsythe
chris at growl.info
Thu Nov 9 02:41:56 UTC 2006
On Nov 8, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Brian West wrote:
> We could at our option allow you to use our Jingle code if needed
> an exception might be possible for you to use it under the terms of
> the LGPL. We have to stick with MPL for our needs due to patented
> technologies like g.729, g.723.1 and AMR along with SS
So basically I don't think we can use Freeswitch, and it's debatable
if we need it.
Why we cannot use freeswitch:
It boils down to a licensing and litigation thing. You (Brian)
yourself said the following:
On Nov 8, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Brian West wrote:
> We could at our option allow you to use our Jingle code if needed
> an exception might be possible for you to use it under the terms of
> the LGPL. We have to stick with MPL for our needs due to patented
> technologies like g.729, g.723.1 and AMR along with SS7 which are
> needed.
Basically I'm interpreting this statement as you saying "We don't
want to get sued". My problem here is that you are more than happy to
relicense the software in a way that would open us up to litigation,
something that would destroy the Adium project in many ways if it
ever went further than a c&d since many of us are located in the US
and not other, more lenient countries.
You also said this:
> In addition an End user is free to combine incompatible code at
> their own freewill but they are limited by the terms of any license
> on distribution of the resulting work.
We're not going to force our end users to "recombine" incompatibly
licensed software.
For more information on why the MPL is specifically incompatible for
those following along at home, here's the info:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses
Adding all of this with the fact that Alvaro says we just don't need
it and you arguing with him on it instead of asking what he thought
would work, and I'm really not feeling all happy, happy; joy, joy
about this proposal.
Don't get me wrong, it's nothing against you or your project at all,
it's just that I don't think it would be such a good idea for us to
go down this path. However, I think the cavalier attitude towards
licensing that Andrew found is indicative of a problem that needs to
be resolved.
So basically, I don't think we can use it. But good luck with your
project and it's nice that someone else is working on Jingle too.
Chris
PS: NIH syndrome usually indicates that you are willing to rewrite
code, not that you will use already written code/libraries. Unless I
misread that statement, you may be interested in this: http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Invented_Here
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20061108/27cf2e34/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list