[Adium-devl] Jingle, Sip and IAX2 in one step
Alvaro Saurin
alvaro.saurin at gmail.com
Thu Nov 9 01:56:57 UTC 2006
On 9 Nov 2006, at 02:37, Brian West wrote:
>
> On Nov 8, 2006, at 7:31 PM, Alvaro Saurin wrote:
>
>> Well, ICE is not a J/XEPs. ICE is specified in http://www.ietf.org/
>> internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-05.txt as a set of algorithms
>> for NAT traversal. Some of these algorithms require some kind of
>> negotiations and, in the XMPP/Jingle world, these negotiations are
>> done with the semantics described in the XEP-176. But ICE is not a
>> requirement...
>
> Regardless of what you think ICE is a requirement to speak with any
> Googletalk client NAT or no NAT.
Brian,
I think ICE it is not required. There is no single line in the XEPs
where ICE is required for a Jingle implementation. In fact, XEP-0166
specifies that "possible content transport methods include Real-time
Transport Protocol (RTP) with Interactive Connectivity Establishment
(ICE) and raw UDP", and XEP-0177 says that candidate addresses should
be "derived via prior discovery using RFC 3489 (STUN), which will be
an address on the outside of the firewall or NAT", but ICE is never
required in the Jingle specification.
Alvaro
--
Alvaro Saurin <alvaro.saurin at gmail.com> <saurin at dcs.gla.ac.uk>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20061109/2b2ac22a/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list