[Adium-devl] Suggestions to help people get comfortable with the Adium code

Christopher Forsythe chris at growl.info
Mon Dec 11 17:15:29 UTC 2006


True enough. In either case, #adium-dev on freenode is all setup  
permissions wise, and I'm working on channel modes now.

Chris

On Dec 11, 2006, at 11:06 AM, disposable at infinitenexus.com wrote:

> Well... to be pedantic about it alphas are a specific type of  
> release, and development in and of itself is not a release, so they  
> are separate topics. To really get something out of a dedicated  
> channel the behavior in the main channel needs to change [i.e,  
> direct people with development issues to #adium-dev] and the wiki/ 
> contact pages updated to state this is a first look resource for  
> those working with Adium code.
>
> - brian 'bgannin' ganninger
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Christopher Forsythe wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Colin Barrett wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 11, 2006, at 11:25 AM, Christopher Forsythe wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why does it matter? We've already got enough #adium-foo  
>>>> channels, why start a new one when we already have one setup?
>>>
>>> We do? The only one I know of that sees any use is #adium. Also,  
>>> it can't be that hard to register a channel.
>>
>> But it does take up Freenode resources to setup a new channel.  
>> #adium-devl is registered to Adam who hasn't been seen on irc for  
>> more than 2 years.
>>
>> However, you guys seem dead set against #adium-alpha  (alpha is  
>> for alpha releases, which development stuff would tend to be) so  
>> I'm registering #adium-dev now.
>>
>> Chris

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/attachments/20061211/d2e5beff/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the devel mailing list