[Adium-devl] ByObject prefs suck

[Colin Barrett]

Indeed, I definitely agree here. David and I have been thinking about  
this for a while (since WWDC, actually). We discussed it a bit re:  
Logging, and this area definitely came up.

Note in the article that Time Machine maintains a separate copy of  
each file every time it's changed, so keeping the number of writes low  
is important.

-Colin

On Dec 8, 2006, at 11:22 PM, David Smith wrote:

> Indeed, but backups of say, last seen times are not so useful. We may
> want to split the more frequent/less useful items out into their own
> file(s).
>
> 							David
>
> On Dec 8, 2006, at 8:06 PM, disposable at infinitenexus.com wrote:
>
>> I don't see any reason why ByObject wouldn't be backed up as normal
>> by Time Machine as certain items may want to be recovered in this
>> fashion - for example, Contact Notes.
>>
>> - brian 'bgannin' ganninger
>>
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2006, at 9:16 PM, David Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Everyone thinking about this topic should read http://
>>> developer.apple.com/leopard/overview/apptech.html, specifically the
>>> section on Time Machine. We'll need to carefully consider how
>>> ByObject interacts with automatic backups of files.
>>>
>>> 					David
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Adium-devl mailing list
>>> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
>>> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Adium-devl mailing list
>> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
>> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Adium-devl mailing list
> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
> http://adiumx.com/mailman/listinfo/adium-devl_adiumx.com