[Adium-devl] Effects of blogging about the beta

[Andreas Monitzer]

On Aug 24, 2006, at 17:51, Evan Schoenberg wrote:

> Any regression at all is
> unacceptable moving forward when we know it exists.  Unexpected
> regressions with a changeset as large as Adium 1.0's are, well, to be
> expected, on some level... but to say, "If you use a proxy. stick
> with Adium 0.89.  If you use ICQ, stick with Adium 0.89.  If you use
> certain brands of routers, stick with Adium 0.89.  If you use an SSH
> tunnel, stick with Adium 0.89.  If you have a SecurID AIM account,
> stick with Adium 0.89.  If you use substitution keywords in your MSN
> display name, stick with Adium 0.89.  If you send messages in Chinese
> or other languages with 2-bit characters and want to view your logs,
> stick with Adium 0.89." is insane.

There's a difference between a missing feature and a bug!

andy