[Adium-devl] Effects of blogging about the beta

[Christopher Forsythe]

On Aug 24, 2006, at 6:44 AM, Colin Barrett wrote:

> On Aug 24 2006, Christopher Forsythe wrote:
>> - At this point, if we drop the policy of requiring that no   
>> regressions from .89.1 be in 1.0, then we could probably cut the   
>> milestone down by 1/3.
>
> Completely, 10 x 10^999 percent disagree.

Only 4 tickets are marked as a regression, 2 of those Joscar.  
However, I'm pretty sure that there is a larger number of items that  
are regressions that we don't have marked as regressions, such as a  
lot of the icq stuff.

I'm not sure how the expectation that we will have no regressions can  
be achieved within a time frame that is reasonable to release 1.0 in  
as well can be maintained, especially with the move to Joscar and the  
massive amount of changes in general within Adium, plus everyone  
going back to school (i.e. less time).

Chris